.Iraqi court acquits former top aide to Saddam Hussein
Iraq's special criminal court Monday acquitted Tariq Aziz, the man who once served as the urbane, cigar-smoking public face of Saddam Hussein's rule, delivering the most significant not-guilty verdict in a series of prosecutions for crimes against humanity that occurred before the U.S. invasion in 2003.
Aziz, who will turn 73 next month, remained in custody, facing charges in two other cases. Only hours after his acquittal, he appeared before another judge to defend himself against charges that he was involved in a massacre of Kurds in 1983.
Even so, the verdict - the first in a case against him - was viewed as a sign of judicial fairness and independence for a controversial tribunal that has been deliberating the most heinous crimes of the Saddam era.
Aziz, who served as foreign minister of Iraq during the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 and as Saddam's deputy prime minister during the U.S. invasion in 2003, was acquitted of culpability in a brutal crackdown against Shiite protesters that followed the assassination of a revered cleric, Grand Ayatollah Mohammed al-Sadr, in 1999.
The court convicted Ali Hassan al-Majid, a former aide known as "Chemical Ali" for ordering poison gas attacks against the Kurds in the 1980s, for his role in those killings, sentencing him to death for a third time.
Two other Saddam aides, Saif al-Din al-Mashhadani and Uglah Abid Siqir al-Kubaysi, both senior Baath party officials who appeared on the infamous deck of playing cards from the U.S. government for Iraq's most wanted officials, were also acquitted in the case.
The court, officially the Iraqi High Tribunal, was created after the 2003 invasion during the U.S.-led provisional government to prosecute cases against Saddam and his top aides. It has dismissed charges and delivered acquittals in a handful of cases, but none involving a defendant as prominent as Aziz.
Reaction to the verdict was mixed.
"According to the Constitution, the judiciary is independent; no one has a right to interfere the decisions that come from the court," Abbas al-Baiaty, a member of Parliament allied with Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki's Dawa party, said by telephone. "We respect these decisions from this court because it is objective."
By contrast, Liqa Jaffar al-Yassin, a member of the movement now lead by the grand ayatollah's son, Moktada al-Sadr, denounced the verdict. "This decision devalues the blood of Sadrists," Yassin said.
IHT
Aziz, who will turn 73 next month, remained in custody, facing charges in two other cases. Only hours after his acquittal, he appeared before another judge to defend himself against charges that he was involved in a massacre of Kurds in 1983.
Even so, the verdict - the first in a case against him - was viewed as a sign of judicial fairness and independence for a controversial tribunal that has been deliberating the most heinous crimes of the Saddam era.
Aziz, who served as foreign minister of Iraq during the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 and as Saddam's deputy prime minister during the U.S. invasion in 2003, was acquitted of culpability in a brutal crackdown against Shiite protesters that followed the assassination of a revered cleric, Grand Ayatollah Mohammed al-Sadr, in 1999.
The court convicted Ali Hassan al-Majid, a former aide known as "Chemical Ali" for ordering poison gas attacks against the Kurds in the 1980s, for his role in those killings, sentencing him to death for a third time.
Two other Saddam aides, Saif al-Din al-Mashhadani and Uglah Abid Siqir al-Kubaysi, both senior Baath party officials who appeared on the infamous deck of playing cards from the U.S. government for Iraq's most wanted officials, were also acquitted in the case.
The court, officially the Iraqi High Tribunal, was created after the 2003 invasion during the U.S.-led provisional government to prosecute cases against Saddam and his top aides. It has dismissed charges and delivered acquittals in a handful of cases, but none involving a defendant as prominent as Aziz.
Reaction to the verdict was mixed.
"According to the Constitution, the judiciary is independent; no one has a right to interfere the decisions that come from the court," Abbas al-Baiaty, a member of Parliament allied with Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki's Dawa party, said by telephone. "We respect these decisions from this court because it is objective."
By contrast, Liqa Jaffar al-Yassin, a member of the movement now lead by the grand ayatollah's son, Moktada al-Sadr, denounced the verdict. "This decision devalues the blood of Sadrists," Yassin said.
IHT
posted by madtom at 9:28 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home