Saturday, May 27, 2006

Trade of kings

"It sounds pretty true to me, it just seems like whoever in power cannot have enough of starting wards, but it's always for a reason and for benefit. There are like a dozen reasons why the United States invaded Iraq, all or none of which could be true. Strategically, some people say that by invading Iraq, the United States got a full cover in the Middle East. For example, Iran would find itself caught in the middle. To one side, there's Afghanistan, Pakistan, Armenia and Turkey, all of which have American Military and Air Force bases. To the other side, there's Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, not mentioning two supposedly secret military bases in Qatar. The U.S Navy also got battle ships and aircraft carriers all over the Persian Gulf and the Arab Sea. The grip seems really tight on Iran, doesn't it? Then Syria, neighboring Turkey, Iraq and of course, Israel. Iraq seems to be a good lock to both Syria and Iran. If a resolution was passed (or not) and a military action was taken against either states, Iraq would probably play a key role in that."
Thought Riot
Boy the world is just jammed packed full of people that would puff on castro's cigar at the drop of a dime. I wish some of these people would get up off their knees, wipe their mouth and take a good look around at what they are really supporting.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home