.It's Not Happening In Afghanistan or Iraq
Michelle Obama after a bad morning or Icelandic Volcano Eyjafjallajokull? You be the judge - Cr: Ice News.is
An infidel nation cannot fight for the soul of an Islamic nation...
Truer words were never spoken by Diana West.
Our belief systems, Islam's and the West's, are so diametrically opposed that our interests cannot intersect.
Yes, both Iraq and Afghanistan will go down as disasters, monumental wastes of manpower and money. Shariah and Democracy are inimical.
And what did we win in Iraq?
It also turns out there is nothing there for infidels to win. After six U.S.-intensive years, Iraq remains just another OPEC-participating, Israel-boycotting, Hezbollah-sympathetic, Sharia-supreme, anti-U.S. entity with new and improved ties to Iran.
And leaving Afghanistan is not a surrender.
This assumption, based in the fallacy that U.S. forces are simply fighting an army called "the Taliban," rather than struggling with a culture called Islam shared by enemy and civilian alike, makes sense only if withdrawing from Afghanistan means ending our efforts against global jihad. The point of withdrawal is not to stop destroying America's active enemies in Afghanistan or elsewhere; this can continue from worldwide bases, or "lily pads," as necessary, as Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (USA ret.) argues. The point of withdrawal is to stop trying to create an American ally out of Sharia-supreme Afghanistan, something we attempted at great expense in Sharia-supreme Iraq, and failed.
Cr: Only a Fool Calls It Surrender by Diana West - Townhall.com
Labels: Democracy in the Middle East, Iran, Iraq, Iraqi politics gone horribly bad, Islam and Democracy, Michelle Obama
posted by Mister Ghost at 10:40 AM
3 Comments:
Here's your Global Lilly Pad, Mad Tom. And that Icelandic volcano is a one volcano Global Warming wrecking machine. LOL. I'm predicting Global Temperatures cool by 1.5 degrees F.
I guess we used to call them aircraft carriers, and I think we had those before 911. I think the only thing novel is that we would send in a "quick strike force" to kill or destroy some target, one at a time. But then once something went wrong, and some team got itself wiped out, of hit the wrong target these same people would be crying bloody murder and demanding we stand down.
Might as well just shoot ourselves and get it over with.
I would predict no change in global temperatures, the particulates that reflect light will counteract the gasses that trap gas. Break even in the end
Post a Comment
<< Home