Iraq Journal: Anbar Awakens, Part I
After spending some time in and around Baghdad with the U.S. military, I visited Ramadi — the capital of Iraq’s notoriously convulsive and violent Anbar province — and breathed an unlikely sigh of relief.
Only a few months ago, Ramadi was one of the most dangerous cities in the world. It was another “Fallujah,” and certainly the most dangerous place in Iraq. Today, to the astonishment of everyone — especially the U.S. Army and Marines — it is perhaps the safest city in all of Iraq outside of Kurdistan.
In August 2006, the Marine Corps — arguably the least defeatist institution in all of America — wrote off Ramadi as irretrievably lost. They weren’t crazy for thinking it. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s Al Qaeda in Iraq had moved in to fight the Americans, and they were welcomed as liberators by a substantial portion of the local population.
I wrote recently that Baghdad, while dangerous and mind-bogglingly dysfunctional, isn’t as bad as it looks on TV. Almost everywhere I have been in the Middle East is more “normal” than it appears in the media.
Nowhere is this more true than in Beirut, but it is true to a lesser extent in Baghdad as well. Baghdad isn’t a normal city, but it appears normal in most places most of the time.
Ramadi, in my experience, is the great exception. Ramadi was worse than it appeared in the media.
Baghdad suffers from political paralysis, a low-grade counterinsurgency, and a very slow-motion civil war. It doesn’t look or feel like a war most of the time, although it does sometimes. What happened in Ramadi wasn’t like that. It wasn’t the surreal sort-of war that still simmers in Baghdad. Two American colonels in charge of the area compared the battle of Ramadi to Stalingrad.
“We were engaged in hours-long full-contact kinetic warfare with enemies in fixed positions,” Army Maj. Lee Peters said.
“There were areas where our odds of being attacked were 100 percent,” Army Capt. Jay McGee told me. “Literally hundreds of IEDs created virtual minefields.”
“The whole area was enemy controlled,” Marine Lt. Jonathan Welch said. “If we went out for even a half-hour we were shot at, and we were shot at accurately. Sometimes we took casualties and were not able to inflict casualties. We didn’t know where they were shooting from.”
Anbar province is the heart of Iraq’s Sunni Triangle, and Ramadi is its capital. Iraq has 18 provinces, but until recently almost a third of all U.S. casualties were in Anbar alone. About 1.3 million people live there, mostly along the Euphrates River, and roughly a third live in Ramadi. Most of the rest live in the also notorious and now largely secured cities of Haditha, Hit and Fallujah.
I haven’t visited the other cities yet because I wanted to begin in the province’s largest and most important city. Ramadi isn’t the most important solely because it’s the capital or because it’s the largest. It is also the most important because Al Qaeda declared it “The Capital of the Islamic State of Iraq.”
“You have to understand what every side’s end state is in Iraq to really understand what’s going on,” said Capt. McGee, in his military intelligence headquarters at the Blue Diamond base just north of the city.
An enormous satellite photo of Ramadi and the surrounding area that functioned as a map took up a whole wall. Local streets were relabeled by the military and given very American names: White Sox Road, Eisenhower Road and Pool Hall Street for example.
“The ideology of AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] is to establish the Islamic Caliphate in Iraq,” McGee said. “In order for them to be successful they must control the Iraqi population through either support or coercion.”
FoxNews
Well Will, I guess my apprehension about discussing the Iran deal was misplaced. I was just a week ahead of the media anyway. Is that a Persian Dragon?
13 Comments:
I have to admit that I missed the day they discussed dragon symbolism in school. It's a three headed dragon, so perhaps only one of the heads is Persian? Neat picture, either way.
"Neat picture"
I know, I saw it hanging in the window and just had to have it. You know I love political art, even though this is a bit more military than plain political, it's a master piece.
Well he does fit a few of the characteristics of a Persian dragon, but not all, so maybe there is more to this imagery. I just had to look it up.
"Persian dragons usually have a prominence on the lower leg. (See morphology for more description.) The other dragons don't have this organ.
Persian dragons always have a single horn on the center of their forehead, with two main prongs. Chinese and Japanese dragons only sometimes have horns; when they do have horns, these are usually in a pair, not singular, with one on either side of the head.
Persian dragons usually seem to lack a tail-tuft of any sort. Chinese dragons have a tail-tuft, which is said to have traits that help distinguish a male dragon from a female.
Persian dragons are almost always shown breathing fire. Chinese and Japanese dragons rarely breathe fire, if ever, although they may breathe clouds.
Persian dragons seem to be strictly terrestrial, without an affinity for flying or swimming, which are both very important activities for Chinese and Japanese dragons."
orion
You are a veritable fountain of information. I think you may have increased my knowledge of dragons by a factor of 5 or more.
I am just now writing a few of my knowledgeable Iraq friends to try and get their input, but I make no promise.
I have found a little bit more. I followed the link to the original Totten posting and found this caption for the image
"This drawing by an Iraqi child depicts the American-Iraqi alliance against Al Qaeda. Notice the sword is Iraqi and the muscle is American."
Michael Totten
Yet he seems to not have noticed the dragon.
So it's true, AQI is out of Ramadi, almost entirely out of Anbar. Great news. It makes sense that the three headed dragon in the drawing would be AQ.
That's an awesome picture.
Thank you Iraqi Mojo.
Strike one for my theory.
Hello Tom!
Thank you for your email invitation to visit your blog.
I think that the photo is similar to the very corny adds in the Iraqi TV channels now, that the US sponsor to convey the message of: we are the good guys, fighters are the bad guys, help us against them, report them to the hot line. made in the most boring soap-opera like ideas and acting.
The Photo, is kind of another face of that campaign, that the American sword has an Iraqi flag at the other end of it, what the? when did it ever happen that the occupying force if a country works for the best of the occupied country? certainly not in Iraq.
And then to add more of the soap-opera effect, the line "together, we work for freedom"
freedom of what exactly? freeing souls outside bodies? thats the only freedom Iraqis ever saw since the occupation!
The whole ideology just like the drawing itself, belong to a 9 years old child. max.
That was my official statement! Thank you for your invitation again!
Until Iraqis admit that most of the killing in Iraq is done by other Iraqis, they're going have a difficult time stopping it.
BP was kind enough to offer a response over at his blogBig Pharaoh, where I had posted a request. He deemed the dragon a devil figure. So I would have to score him as another strike..
Khalid thanks for your "official" response.
You need not wait for an invitation to post here as your always welcome.
But I do have to laugh, you seem to have sided with the Bush supporters. who would have guessed that Khalid would be a mouthpiece for the Bush administration!
Anyway the score so far:
Bush talking points -- 4
Madtom -- 0
Maybe I'll do better in the second half
Well there is noting like an independent verification to help move your ideas along.
Score one for madtom
Post a Comment
<< Home