.Bush Says Iraq War Is Part of a Larger Fight
President Bush began a new drive today to rally the American people behind him on the Iraq war and national security, declaring that the United States must stay the course in Iraq because it is a battleground in an epic struggle between democracy and tyranny.
Mr. Bush told the American Legion convention in Salt Lake City that the terrorists who attacked the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, have much in common with the suicide bombers of Baghdad and the Hezbollah militants who rain rockets on Israel.
Whatever their ethnic or religious differences, Mr. Bush said, they are united in their wish “to turn back the advance of freedom, and impose a dark vision of tyranny and terror across the world.”
Mr. Bush scoffed at his critics’ charges that the American-led campaign in Iraq is a distraction from the real struggle against Al Qaeda terrorists. “That would come as news to Osama bin Laden,” he said, asserting that terrorists from other countries in the Middle East are making their way to Iraq to try to smother the emerging democracy.
“And the unifying feature of this movement, the link that spans sectarian divisions and local grievances, is the rigid conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of Islam,” Mr. Bush said.
The president’s 40-minute address, coming on the heels of similarly aggressive speeches on Tuesday by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to the legionnaires and Vice President Dick Cheney to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, underscored the White House’s determination to make the Iraq war a fundamental issue in the November elections as Republicans try to keep control of Congress and Democrats try to capitalize on growing impatience with the war.
“In the coming days, I’ll deliver a series of speeches describing the nature of our enemy in the war on terror, the insights we’ve gained about their aims and ambitions, the successes and setbacks we’ve experienced, and our strategy to prevail in this long war,” Mr. Bush said.
Mr. Bush also chided Iran and Syria for their support of Hezbollah, and he said that Iran must not be allowed to fulfill its nuclear ambitions. He pledged that the United States would continue to seek a diplomatic solution to bridge the deep differences with Iran, “but there must be consequences for Iran’s defiance.”
Yet Mr. Bush acknowledged that the United States must assume some blame for the smoldering resentments in the region. “For a half-century, America’s primary goal in the Middle East was stability,” he said, recalling the cold war era. “This was understandable at the time.” But Washington’s support of anti-communist dictators was accompanied by growing despair and radicalism, he said, alluding to the seizure of Americans at the United States Embassy in Iran after the pro-American but dictatorial Shah of Iran was overthrown.
Doubtless familiar with polls showing increasing numbers of Americans drawing a distinction between the Iraq war and a larger battle against terrorism, Mr. Bush invoked the approaching anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks to rebut that view.
That September morning brought to the United States “a war we didn’t ask for, but a war we must wage, and a war we will win,” Mr. Bush said. And if the United States tires of fighting in the streets of Baghdad, he said, “we will face the terrorists in the streets of our own cities.”
“So the United States will not leave until victory is achieved,” Mr. Bush said, warning that more sacrifice lies ahead and that the struggle will be a long one.
Seeking to disarm critics who say that the administration has bungled the war in Iraq, Mr. Bush said he and his commanders are united in their resolve for victory yet flexible enough to adapt tactics to changing conditions. But he said the war, in Iraq and against terrorism generally, will not be won by military might alone.
“Every element of national power” is being marshaled in “the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century,” Mr. Bush said.
Democrats were quick to denounce the president’s speech. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the minority leader, said the president’s “failed policies” have made the United States less safe in the past five years. “Democrats will lead the American people with tough and smart policies that will make us safer by beginning the redeployment of troops from Iraq, refocusing our efforts on the war on terror, and protecting Americans from terrorism here at home,” Mr. Reid said.
And Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts called the speech “a cynical attempt to help his Republican enablers survive the November elections at a time when he should be spending all of his time working to chart a new course in Iraq.”
Mr. Bush, unlike Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld, did not use the word “appease” today. As for those who doubt the wisdom of the war in Iraq, he said, “Many of these folks are sincere and patriotic. They cannot be more wrong.”
Mr. Bush did not use the term “Islamic fascists” today, as he had recently. But he did employ similar language. “As veterans, you have seen this kind of enemy before,” he said. “They’re successors to fascists, to Nazis, to communists and other totalitarians of the 20th century, and history shows what the outcome will be.”
Ultimately, he said, the outcome will be “victory for the cause of freedom and liberty.”
The president again described America’s purpose in Iraq as at once idealistic and deeply pragmatic. Victory there will guarantee the Iraqi people freedom, and the country will be a beacon for other freedom-loving peoples in the Middle East, Mr. Bush said. And a free country does not become “an incubator for terrorist movements,” he went on.
Mr. Bush was applauded frequently. He had not only a friendly audience but a friendly setting: he carried Utah over Senator John Kerry by 71 to 29 percent in 2004, for his biggest margin of victory in any state.
The battles in Iraq will one day rank alongside those at Omaha Beach and Guadalcanal as mileposts on the path to liberty, Mr. Bush said. “We know that the direction of history leads toward freedom.”
NYT
Did anyone besides Ladybird and me notice the fake clapping that was going on at that speech? What's up with that. Are they so hard up for some approval they hired professional clapping people.
And I know they must be putting something in my water, I just wrote a comment that sounded almost exactly like that, and this is the first time I read the speech. All I caught was the end on a replay on C-SPAN.
Mr. Bush told the American Legion convention in Salt Lake City that the terrorists who attacked the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, have much in common with the suicide bombers of Baghdad and the Hezbollah militants who rain rockets on Israel.
Whatever their ethnic or religious differences, Mr. Bush said, they are united in their wish “to turn back the advance of freedom, and impose a dark vision of tyranny and terror across the world.”
Mr. Bush scoffed at his critics’ charges that the American-led campaign in Iraq is a distraction from the real struggle against Al Qaeda terrorists. “That would come as news to Osama bin Laden,” he said, asserting that terrorists from other countries in the Middle East are making their way to Iraq to try to smother the emerging democracy.
“And the unifying feature of this movement, the link that spans sectarian divisions and local grievances, is the rigid conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of Islam,” Mr. Bush said.
The president’s 40-minute address, coming on the heels of similarly aggressive speeches on Tuesday by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to the legionnaires and Vice President Dick Cheney to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, underscored the White House’s determination to make the Iraq war a fundamental issue in the November elections as Republicans try to keep control of Congress and Democrats try to capitalize on growing impatience with the war.
“In the coming days, I’ll deliver a series of speeches describing the nature of our enemy in the war on terror, the insights we’ve gained about their aims and ambitions, the successes and setbacks we’ve experienced, and our strategy to prevail in this long war,” Mr. Bush said.
Mr. Bush also chided Iran and Syria for their support of Hezbollah, and he said that Iran must not be allowed to fulfill its nuclear ambitions. He pledged that the United States would continue to seek a diplomatic solution to bridge the deep differences with Iran, “but there must be consequences for Iran’s defiance.”
Yet Mr. Bush acknowledged that the United States must assume some blame for the smoldering resentments in the region. “For a half-century, America’s primary goal in the Middle East was stability,” he said, recalling the cold war era. “This was understandable at the time.” But Washington’s support of anti-communist dictators was accompanied by growing despair and radicalism, he said, alluding to the seizure of Americans at the United States Embassy in Iran after the pro-American but dictatorial Shah of Iran was overthrown.
Doubtless familiar with polls showing increasing numbers of Americans drawing a distinction between the Iraq war and a larger battle against terrorism, Mr. Bush invoked the approaching anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks to rebut that view.
That September morning brought to the United States “a war we didn’t ask for, but a war we must wage, and a war we will win,” Mr. Bush said. And if the United States tires of fighting in the streets of Baghdad, he said, “we will face the terrorists in the streets of our own cities.”
“So the United States will not leave until victory is achieved,” Mr. Bush said, warning that more sacrifice lies ahead and that the struggle will be a long one.
Seeking to disarm critics who say that the administration has bungled the war in Iraq, Mr. Bush said he and his commanders are united in their resolve for victory yet flexible enough to adapt tactics to changing conditions. But he said the war, in Iraq and against terrorism generally, will not be won by military might alone.
“Every element of national power” is being marshaled in “the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century,” Mr. Bush said.
Democrats were quick to denounce the president’s speech. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the minority leader, said the president’s “failed policies” have made the United States less safe in the past five years. “Democrats will lead the American people with tough and smart policies that will make us safer by beginning the redeployment of troops from Iraq, refocusing our efforts on the war on terror, and protecting Americans from terrorism here at home,” Mr. Reid said.
And Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts called the speech “a cynical attempt to help his Republican enablers survive the November elections at a time when he should be spending all of his time working to chart a new course in Iraq.”
Mr. Bush, unlike Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld, did not use the word “appease” today. As for those who doubt the wisdom of the war in Iraq, he said, “Many of these folks are sincere and patriotic. They cannot be more wrong.”
Mr. Bush did not use the term “Islamic fascists” today, as he had recently. But he did employ similar language. “As veterans, you have seen this kind of enemy before,” he said. “They’re successors to fascists, to Nazis, to communists and other totalitarians of the 20th century, and history shows what the outcome will be.”
Ultimately, he said, the outcome will be “victory for the cause of freedom and liberty.”
The president again described America’s purpose in Iraq as at once idealistic and deeply pragmatic. Victory there will guarantee the Iraqi people freedom, and the country will be a beacon for other freedom-loving peoples in the Middle East, Mr. Bush said. And a free country does not become “an incubator for terrorist movements,” he went on.
Mr. Bush was applauded frequently. He had not only a friendly audience but a friendly setting: he carried Utah over Senator John Kerry by 71 to 29 percent in 2004, for his biggest margin of victory in any state.
The battles in Iraq will one day rank alongside those at Omaha Beach and Guadalcanal as mileposts on the path to liberty, Mr. Bush said. “We know that the direction of history leads toward freedom.”
NYT
Did anyone besides Ladybird and me notice the fake clapping that was going on at that speech? What's up with that. Are they so hard up for some approval they hired professional clapping people.
And I know they must be putting something in my water, I just wrote a comment that sounded almost exactly like that, and this is the first time I read the speech. All I caught was the end on a replay on C-SPAN.
posted by madtom at 11:42 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home