.Willie Pete!!!!
"Oh, give me a freakin' break.
Now the UK Independent is trying to call White Phosphorous shells "chemical weapons."
These ignorant slimesuckers even use the term "chemical weapons" in the headline.
And watch the outrageously slanted way they set up the lede:"
CounterColumn
posted by madtom at 10:14 AM
4 Comments:
The Independent doesn't actually describe white phosphorous as a chemical weapon if you take the trouble to read the article. There have apparently been allegations that genuine chemical weapons have been used as well as white phosphorous, which is why "used chemical weapons" appears (between quotation marks!) in the headline.
"There have apparently been allegations that genuine chemical weapons "
Do you have any references for that? I know there have been claims. baseless claims, from the beginning of the war. But to date I have not seen any evidence whatsoever of any chemical weapons. The only thing that I have ever seen that explained the rumors of chemical weapons is the WP that was used during the initial invasion of Fallujah. And if you watch that video you will see that the "innocent civilians" were in fact well armed fighters wearing bullet proof vest.
I have references for the allegations -- the Independent article, for one. Of course I can't prove that they're true, but IIRC the Independent didn't suggest that they necessarily were.
But it's just a cheep hoax to get rating or churn up some good old anti American feelings that they love to have. These "allegations"are not new they are over a year old, they could have collected some soil and water samples and had them analyzed. Where are the results, where is the proof to make these kinds of accusations. Like I said if you watch the so called documentary, there is nothing but old war clips from the net. I could have made this film, most if not all of those clips have been linked on this blog.
Where's the beef?
Post a Comment
<< Home